Meta:Requests for adminship/Clv309

From Meta Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Clv309 TalkContribs • Last 20 Forum - Main - User talk editsEdit count

I am completing a self-nomination for meta admin which has been floated a time or two in the #recent-changes-meta channel in order to block obvious spam accounts. There are only a handful of us who monitor the channel and I am frequently pinging meta admins.

I, Clv309, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realise that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my tools because I realise that this is a serious offence. If the community finds that I have done so, my tools will be revoked, and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, Christine 15:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC).

Questions for the nominee

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
Blocking spam accounts and deleting their user pages.

2. What have been your most helpful contributions to the Weird Gloop Wikis, and why?
Examples (reverse chronological order) of me harassing meta admins to deal with spam: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I don't think so, and certainly not over editing. I am primarily active on Discord only, except for when I spam RSW RC with redirects. Otherwise, nothing in the last decade(?) to speak of.

Additional questions (asked by the community if necessary)


Support - Has proven herself to be knowledgeable on policies, active on Discord, and also has been around for a long time. Considering how much I see her needing to ping meta admins on Discord for anti-vandalism, I'm confident in her ability to patrol RC for the meta wiki (which doesn't need much monitoring anyway), and her ability to manage global anti-vandalism tools (as meta admins have access to global AbuseFilters etc). Template:Signatures/JaydenKieran 15:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - cqm talk 19:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - ʞooɔ 22:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - MitcheII (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - bots begone - Towelcat (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - begone, bots Hephaestus 23:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - BOTS GET YE GONE FjaraTalkRxSktuY.png 23:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Support -  BlackHawk (Talk)    10:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - Christine has shown a consistent watch for spam accounts on meta. -Legaia 2 Pla · ʟ · 14:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Support Oppose - We already have a hard enough time retaining our core demographic on meta of users with detailed biographies that link to external sites that happen to be spam, without Christine banning them as bots. - TehKittyCatTalk Wikian-Book 18:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Saw port - quite excellent Talk-to Kelsey 18:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - Yes BrokTALK 18:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - Elessar2 (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - // Salix // Talk-to Salix // 16:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

--Iiii I I I 19:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Closed - Christine is now a meta sysop. ʞooɔ 19:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Support - "you can always vote even after a thread is closed" -steve ~ BigDiesel2m (talk) 19:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)